Bread Crumbs

https://motherboard.vice.com/read/why-did-the-genetic-code-of-all-life-on-earth-suddenly-stop-evolving


https://motherboard.vice.com/read/scientists-think-intelligent-life-could-have-evolved-before-brains-slime-mold-learning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unreasonable_Effectiveness_of_Mathematics_in_the_Natural_Sciences

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MckuBQC6gKU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijjsjCv6k7w

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20150803-physics-theories-map/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160324-in-newly-created-life-form-a-major-mystery/


-
5-8-16
-
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=para+digm

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/field-guide-to-defending-hillary-clinton-against-fake-scandals/24710/

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/05/06/3775910/hillary-clinton-faith-profile/

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/36713-a-contested-convention-is-exactly-what-the-democratic-party-needs

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/36702-david-brooks-discovers-income-inequality

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/36742-point-of-no-return-obamas-legacy-in-the-middle-east

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/bernard-carr/time-and-consciousness_b_9855418.html?utm_content=bufferf22ec&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Incomplete Geometry

In the process of investigating the genome piece there was a podcast of it which included a prior segment.

[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]

In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.

Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24. 

I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical. 

But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid.  Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?

* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we?  (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling

Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion


https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/


*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)

BTW:
What is living?

5-4-16 
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks:  3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...

5-5-16  OW / VP  (need more labels)

Of(or) re-con4th[!]

Then there is my experience in several aspects of hospitality and structural recreation.
Pardon the conflation of fields, but I leave aside the early years in the hotels and restaurants and bookkeeping.  I refer to exporting building* materials, building a home and maintaining an apartment building, let alone meta-4s.

* not yet read more than a paragraph of so

The Square Root of

[" i. "]

This ... is not being facetious or Freudian.  But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*




BTW:  NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive








Co-wink Key-dink ?  D'oh!




(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)

1.  the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2.  Chesterton on importance of fables
3.  ditto
4.  semantic (bs)/bs
5.  Mobius
Notational  Segway [!] *



*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you

Writing while nuanced.

Several alternatives to this heading were considered.  "Reading while nuanced." 
"Something while white." "Anything while Brooks."  OK, they all kind of evolved.*





My point is that Brooks and West are both critical of Coates from a Dream Perspective.






Mean~while there aRe other Elements** of Style[!]







* on the other hand
(Elements) italicized till read  / Bolds emphasized read.


Not to be misunderstood, West is about realizing the dream, Brooks is about not realizing the perspective.  Both attempt to compliment, but then...there may be the need to complement.
[...UC]


(7-24-15) NFRY SEGWAY:  Prior to the Sandra Bland "tragedy"*, I had my own experience with a traffic stop.  I was going 48 in a 35, on 4th of July, just outside Mount Rainier National Park. (So the officer told me.)  Actually I wish I could recall how he framed his initial comments in the form of a question.  I was completely accepting of his information, although my wife thought it may have helped if I had thrown in a "sir" here or there.

What occurred to me later, was what form of answer was I expected to give.  I mentioned having just pulled over to allow tailgaters to pass and had just pulled back into traffic and maybe been concerned about those that may be about to replace them, not remembering the speed had been reduced from 55mph.  Actually I know I am now recalling it more carefully, than I probably framed the answer at the time.  The point is whether it is a practice to frame charges in the form of a question?  Of course remembering the question and giving an accurate answer may be beside the point.  Are there appropriate answers that would change the situation?  Thankfully several inappropriate answers or questions did not occur to me. 

*debacle

Link to be found later...

or tangent.

Let alone course correction.

5-5-15
Speaking of trolling, I am fishing for a recent snag in my seine net or gill in my safety-net.  Somewhere in the area of foreign policy or economics, I recognized a contradiction in my lede-or-ship.  Bingo. 

(FP of sorts)
 [a thru i: order of link -- numerical order of insert.]
a 1, Five Things Ben Carson Doesn’t Get
b 2, A., B. C3-PO?, C., D., E., F. The Other Debates, G. Karl Rove vs. WA Hyperbole, H. Toll Keen, the Try-Logy?  , I. Toll Keen?
c 8, We R all Right?
d 9 Too Random... , (fp-11-13)
e 6
f  5
g 4
h 3
i 7 Divide to conquer?

[Elements to Hegel over ... ?]
[ MSNBC: AM inside joke Obama Letterman Dominoes! The Cycle. SB(t) Stochastic blowback or Honeypot? ]
[Seg way Hardball* Charlie/Bernie: Top 14 increased over bottom 130 million net.]

* 5-6-15 link attempt failed test
x, y, z
u, v, w?

Lost

... and found !

(nexus)

NPR

Word
  Natural *
  Political
  Reactionism***
Social Stigmatism.

*8-23-13 bold, indents and S,S&N links added
[missing links on Carlin ? !** ]
**sensitive language warning! But WT* (FP1)
***  not just China or the poke a knows. 

Post-Pyth

Speaking of headings and lede or ships,

it was not that Greek to me,

other than Pythagoras and the pre-calculus of culture. 
In that *vane* or *weather* the GPS is communcating,
here are some points:

We're in Trouble: Salon / Gore
The Drone Weasels : Slate / Saletan
Secrecy Corrodes Democracy: Consortium News / Parry

While I have not fully read these, I have previously deployed their headlines or sorts *ofor* paraphrases.  Not that they aren't capable of mis-ledes or weasels or being Greek to any of us. 

E-Merging from this? 
It is not just about bending the law but the processes[*] that bend the law. 

[Owe/OW] (fn)

*bracketeds* = pun, [!] or (sic).
[*] late M-bed ? ['n-Oh-particular order!]

2-12-13 Please NOTE My comment below this post,
 Re: PC** and 4 moolahs / mediums.[and 4ms] WU who! [!] ? [speaking of *blank*volutions ! ('n bs)]

Update: LEGEND PAGE, (FC), Updates.

** caution see LEGEND and *aster*risks[!]
i.e. Re:Political Calculus *&* cultured dishes and dashes (O _ U _ C _ H ?)